Weighting-specific best practices:
...
- For example, 1-10 with 1 being the least impact and 10 being the most impact. For a question who’s answer minimally impacts risk, assign a weight of 1 to this question. Alternatively, for a question who’s answer has the greatest impact on risk, assign a weight of 10 to this question.
...
- Option 1: Yes (Multipler = 0. Thus, weight of 10 x multiplier of 0 = risk score of 0, meaning that by being SOC 2 compliant, no risk is identified.)
- Option 2: No (Multiplier = 1. Thus, weight of 10 x multiplier of 1 = risk score of 10, meaning that by not being SOC 2 compliant, great risk is identified.)
- For example, Question C.1 - Is your organization SOC 2 compliant? (Assigned weight is 10, meaning that the answer to this question has the greatest impact on risk to my organization.)
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
- For example, Question D.1 - How would you characterize your organization’s overall information security program? (Weight = 5)
...
- “See attached ‘SOC 2’ report to Question C.1.1. Not a true SOC 2 report.”
- For example, my recipient answered Yes to Question C.1 - Is your organization SOC 2 compliant? I had created a file upload subquestion (C.1.1) asking my recipient to upload their most recent report (but assigned a weight of 0 to this file upload question). After reviewing the attached file, I realize that it is not a true SOC 2 report. Therefore, as I review the questionnaire responses, I write a comment that states:
- When changing Risk Rating of a vendor object for this reason, ALWAYS input a comment in the text box below the “New value” dropdown to capture why (with associated user make the change and date/time stamp captured).
...